Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Show more types:

100 Replies

 @8C66FVT from New Hampshire  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8BYVY6B from North Carolina  answered…5yrs5Y

if its a deadly situation or disesse i feel like they shuld but at the time someone who doesnt want there child to get it for whatever reason, they shouldnt be forced

 @8CDYR5W from Tennessee  answered…5yrs5Y

parents should do what they think would be best for them and their children

 @8CK9LVK from North Carolina  answered…5yrs5Y

I think they should give it to families for free, but only if they want it.

 @8CR9Y5W from South Carolina  answered…5yrs5Y

It depends considering some kids can't have certain vaccines because of their weak body or something

 @ISIDEWITHanswered…5yrs5Y

No clear stance given on mandatory vaccination of children, supportive of properly tested vaccines in general

 @2ZBFV4Vanswered…5yrs5Y

No, but require it to attend public school and hold parents criminally liable for transferring deadly diseases to other children

 @8CY5FJV from California  answered…5yrs5Y

The parents should get their children vaccinated, but government shouldn't force them to

 @8CQ85DK from Colorado  answered…5yrs5Y

 @78S5M87 from Wisconsin  answered…5yrs5Y

 @78S5M87 from Wisconsin  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8DD2TCY from Georgia  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, but only for deadly contagious diseases and with exceptions for people whose religious beliefs forbid the use of vaccines

 @8DNJZJT from Nebraska  answered…5yrs5Y

No, It's not the government's job to tell you what should go into your body.

 @8DNWMX7 from North Carolina  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8DP4ST3 from Wisconsin  answered…5yrs5Y

For deadly contagious disease but with exceptions for those whose religious beliefs forbid use of vaccines.

 @8DR2W8T from Wisconsin  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8DSKCGHanswered…5yrs5Y

No vaccines are very bad for you especially the COVID one that is going to come out

 @8DPW5VD from Wisconsin  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, but with exceptions for children who are allergic or have religious beliefs that forbid the use of vaccines

 Deletedanswered…5yrs5Y

 @8F32TMM from Alabama  answered…5yrs5Y

while I do think everyone should be vaccinated for preventable diseases, it's up to the parents to decide for their own children unless specifically advised (due to certain medical conditions) by a family physician or pediatrician. the government shouldn't be involved and shouldn't make it REQUIRED as that might be against some people's rights/religions.

 @8F4ZGL3 from Wisconsin  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, in order to attend public school. With the exception to those who have medical issues where they can't be vaccinated and to those who are a part of a religion that is against vaccines.

 @8F6F7FS from Ohio  answered…5yrs5Y

No I think the parents have the final say over there children and if the kid wants to go get vaccinated they should be allowed.

 @8DN4WYN from Pennsylvania  answered…5yrs5Y

My personal position is yes but that shouldn't be a government position.

 @8FKCN5Q from North Carolina  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8FPLGKD from Texas  answered…5yrs5Y

No, but hold all citizens criminally liable for negligence and endangerment should they catch or transfer a deadly disease if the vaccine is publicly offered.

 @8FS26RC from Illinois  answered…5yrs5Y

No, it is unconstitutional to force people to vaccinate their children and to force anyone to receive vaccinations without consent. Vaccinations are not risk free and no parent should be forced to take unnecessary risks pertaining to the health of their children.

 @8FSLGMY from New York  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8FYVM7S from Kansas  answered…5yrs5Y

There needs to be test done to make sure every kids is safe and not allergic to it

 @riddlecongress from Connecticut  answered…5yrs5Y

No. We are a country built on Freedom and Freedom of choice. Religious exemptions are here to stay. However, I do support public health requirements for infectious diseases such as measles, black death, and other eradicated deadly diseases.

 @8GBB4FJ from Wisconsin  answered…5yrs5Y

No, but schools should be able to reject students that aren't vaccinated, except in cases of sincerely held religious beliefs.

 @8GMR5G7 from Ohio  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, along with, on the news, "explaining" to viewers how doctors have "changed" what's in vaccines, but also say that Anti-Vaxxers "have a shared dark secret", but they would have to look at the end of the news broadcast's speech to text transcript in order to get Anti-Vaxxers to vaccinate both their kids and themselves, but instead have this "secret" merged with the final paragraph, and say that nothing has changed about vaccines, they only said this to get Anti-Vaxxers to vaccinate themselves and their families. On top of this, funding publ…  Read more

 @8GMPK8G from Ohio  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8GR8N5C from Texas  answered…5yrs5Y

I am unsure because it is important to get vaccinated, especially if they are deadly contagious ones but it is also up to the parents

 @8GZRRFC from Massachusetts  answered…5yrs5Y

No but they should require vaccination in order to attend to school and jobs.

 @8H2M78L from Texas  answered…5yrs5Y

No, only require for public schooling and hold parents criminally liable for transferring deadly diseases to other children.

 @awntkmess from North Carolina  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8HBPCKZ from Georgia  answered…5yrs5Y

No, and make vaccine drug companies liable for injury from vaccines again.

 @8FVR6DM from Hawaii  answered…5yrs5Y

No, It should be up to the parents. The parents should be able to decide if they want their children vaccinated.

 @8HK67RX from Pennsylvania  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, unless the child is confirmed by a reliable doctor to be allergic to said vaccine

 @8HLJZ9Y from Oklahoma  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8HNJ8QB from California  answered…5yrs5Y

For shots that have been around many years and have been proven to help stop very contagious disease yes for flue shot and new shots such as the new vaccine coming for COVID 19 I believe that should be the persons choice

 @8HQ92VL from North Carolina  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, but with exceptions for people with religious beliefs or previous medical conditions

 @8HQTH28 from Texas  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, they are essential to protecting other children, but I think respecting someone's religious practices is important too.

 @2PR69DManswered…5yrs5Y

No, but allow people to sue parents of unvaccinated children for a small sum if their child gets sick after coming into contact with their unvaccinated child.

 @8HR65JW from Texas  answered…5yrs5Y

I think it is best to have the vaccine at your own risk if contracted any symptoms.

 @8HL5YXT from Arizona  answered…5yrs5Y

it depends upon the parents and the child has a right to his or her own body

 @8HVK3VK from Arkansas  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8HVQ4L5 from Vermont  answered…5yrs5Y

As long as the government is transparent about the vaccine and the people are informed about what they're getting.

 @8J2N55R from Maryland  answered…5yrs5Y

I believe all children should be vaccinated, but it is really up to the parents to decide.

 @8J2MTWY from New Jersey  answered…5yrs5Y

I believe an experimental vaccine that has no long term criteria should be the choice of the parent. While widely used vaccines should be required so long as there were no discrepancies when it came to the contents of the vaccine.

 @8J2QWGS from Michigan  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8J3JD4G from Maine  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes unless they have an allergic/adverse reaction or it is dangerous to them for some other medical reason (immunocompromised for example).

 @casualspook from California  answered…5yrs5Y

Sometimes, children should be exempt if it is a provable health risk for them or goes against religious beliefs. However, those children should not be able to go to public school and put young children at risk that are too young to be vaccinated.

 @8J9JV34 from Oklahoma  answered…5yrs5Y

No, but have government incentives to entice parents to vaccinate their kids.

 @8JP4VGF from Oklahoma  answered…5yrs5Y

No, America is a free country, the government shouldn't control the people.

 @8JGSKD5 from Oklahoma  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8JP729G from California  answered…5yrs5Y

I think parents should be able to pick for their children whether or not to get one.

 @8JPK2KV from California  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8HXWBY9 from Arkansas  answered…5yrs5Y

I believe that getting your child(ren) vaccinated would be better, but if the parent(s) do not want to they don't have to. But it's on them if something bad happens.

 @8JVDV4R from Arizona  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, but only for those without pre-existing conditions in which a vaccination would harm them.

 @8JRGWTX from Oklahoma  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8K4HYJQ from New Jersey  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8J4H94B from California  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, but with the exception that their child not getting the vaccine isnt gonna harm or kill them

 @8KBRKCC from Nevada  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8KH79S2 from Washington  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8KPF28P from Pennsylvania  answered…5yrs5Y

No, the government can not require vaccinations, however, funding should be allocated to the education of families on the benefits and necessity of vaccines for public health. Public schools should require vaccines.

 @8KRSKYV from Massachusetts  answered…5yrs5Y

Sometimes its against religoins to vacinate, so I say no. However if people dont vacinate, they cant blame the goverment for it.

 @8KRN5WY from Ohio  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, but only with vaccinations that have been around for a while/tested multiple times.

 @8KS3ZW3 from Missouri  answered…5yrs5Y

 @87KZ8P5 from New Jersey  answered…5yrs5Y

As a result of Covid we have remote learning and the ability to jack into any classroom with a mic and a camera, therefore excluding children without vaccine need not deprive them of schooling, so 1) I have no problem excluding children from schools who cannot or have not gotten vaccinated, and 2) parents should be civilly and criminally liable to anyone who the diseases are passed on to.

 @8KRP22Z from Missouri  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8L3V7FJ from Illinois  answered…5yrs5Y

No the parent or gardian should have full control over vaccines but should take steps to protect others.

 @8L8DRXY from California  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes but only for deadly contagious diseases and if the government is positive that the vaccine will not affect the children in a bad way.

 @8LFVSCT from Colorado  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, and make it illegal to not vaccinate a child that can be vaccinated safely.

 @8LT6R8W from New York  answered…5yrs5Y

Politcally I dont think it is the governments place to mandate something like that but morally I believe in the use of vaccines

 @8LGHYLR from Kansas  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8M93KFX from Kentucky  answered…5yrs5Y

It should be required for more deadly diseases such as measles, mumps, rubella, but not for less harmful ones such as the flu.

 @78S5M87 from Wisconsin  answered…5yrs5Y

 @78S5M87 from Wisconsin  answered…5yrs5Y

 @78S5M87 from Wisconsin  answered…5yrs5Y

 @78S5M87 from Wisconsin  answered…5yrs5Y

 @78S5M87 from Wisconsin  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8MFLBST from North Carolina  answered…5yrs5Y

I believe both ways because it could possibly help save a child's life, but I like for the parents to decide unless it is harming the child. Also this world is getting really soft and parents are scared about a lot of stuff.

 @8MHP3YT from Colorado  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes and no--I'm not fully sure. Minimum they should be required to be vaccinated to attend public school.

 @8MNYGHJanswered…5yrs5Y

yes all children should be vaccinated accept children who prove to be allergec to the contents of vaccines. people found to have not vaccinated there child should be charged with child abuse